One of the core parts of the Big Bang theory is related to the production of specific conditions that were needed for the appearance of select elements. A researcher has elaborated on a new study that claims that the event did not take place.
The Big Bang scenario implies that an explosion took place during the dawn of the universe, almost 13.8 million years ago.
During the explosion, chemical elements were propelled across space by the powerful force. After the elements cooled down, they formed the stars and galaxies. A significant part of the modern astronomical principles related to the origin and development of our universe is based on the Big Bang Theory. The study elaborated by the researcher focuses on three critical fusion events that should have been influenced by the Big Bang.
Is the Big Bang theory false?
It is theorized that specific amounts of helium, deuterium, and lithium were generated by fusion reactions that took place in the extremely dense and hot cloud of chemical elements that were produced by the Big Bang.
Lerner spent several decades on the observations of such reactions and argued that he and other researchers found information that doesn’t match the principles of the theory. He discovered that old stars featureless and 50% of the helium and less than 10% of the lithium content that is anticipated by the Big Bang nucleosynthesis theory. According to this theory, one-quarter of all the mass found in the universe is represented by helium.
The Big Bang should have led to the destruction of both matter and antimatter, resulting in a density o matter that should be considerably lower in comparison to what has been observed. Such a result can be avoided by using an asymmetry of matter and antimatter, but extensive experiments cannot validate the consequences. Some voices in the scientific community argue that GOLE should replace the Big Bang theory.